Author: Carmen Yap
Yap, Carmen, 2015 Why Confess? The Role of Instrumental and Symbolic Motivations on Confessions in an Interpersonal Context, Flinders University, School of Psychology
This electronic version is made publicly available by Flinders University in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material and/or you believe that any material has been made available without permission of the copyright owner please contact firstname.lastname@example.org with the details.
The aim of the present research is to better understand the motivations driving the decision to confess in an interpersonal context. In a theoretical taxonomy I propose that individuals confess wrongdoing for either symbolic or instrumental reasons, and for individual or social purposes. These two orthogonal continua create a four-factor integrated model of motivations. That is, motivations driving the decision to confess can be individual instrumental (benefits to the self), individual symbolic (self-integrity), social instrumental (welfare of another) or social symbolic (group values and identity). Whether these motivations lead to confessions or non-confession depends on situational or dispositional factors such as the trustworthiness of the confidant and/or the offender's propensity to trust.
Subject: Psychology thesis
Thesis type: Doctor of Philosophy
School: School of Psychology
Supervisor: Associate Professor Michael Wenzel